Pseudo argument in real world 9/19/07

In the real world, I have encountered many situations that care considered pseudo arguments. Pseudo arguments are arguments that are based on opinion by both parties, and that an argument can go on and on. A good example of this is whether dogs are better than cats; there are no facts that can really prove a statement that cannot be countered. Arguments in our government today could to some degree be considered pseudo arguments. The death penalty is a very good example of this, some people say yes the criminal deserves it, and some say no based on their own beliefs and morals. I have had many arguments about political topics, and at some point both people have to agree to disagree, seeing that most of these topics will never have an answer that they can both agree on. There are also debates on which food is better, these opinions can vary, which is because some people like spicy food, and some people like sour food. Basically any situation that really cannot be resolved, because these arguments cannot be measured since both people will have different opinions.